1940’s – 1985

1940s
First Generation Non-Locked Nails
History of Intramedullary Nailing

1940s
First Generation Non-Locked Nails
German surgeon Gerhard Küntscher pioneered the first-generation non-locked nails. These V-shaped and cloverleaf-shaped stainless-steel implants achieved stable osteosynthesis by flexible impingement of the nail in the bone without locking screws.

1950s
Intramedullary Reaming Introduced
History of Intramedullary Nailing
1950s
Intramedullary Reaming Introduced
Albert Wilhelm Fischer introduced intramedullary reaming to accommodate larger nails with greater stability through increased cortical contact. This increased contact area enhances the implant’s stability within the bone, providing greater resistance to rotational and axial forces exerted on the fractured limb.


1960s
Orthopaedic Breakthroughs
History of Intramedullary Nailing
1960s
Orthopaedic Breakthroughs
Robert Zickel developed the first cephalomedullary nail for proximal femur fractures. This introduced a breakthrough approach to treating challenging proximal femur fractures. The introduction of radiological imaging intensification sparked interest in closed nailing techniques with much lower risk to patients and surgeons.


1970s
Perren’s Interfragmentary Strain Theory (1979)
History of Intramedullary Nailing

1970s
Perren’s Interfragmentary Strain Theory (1979)
Stephan Perren published his interfragmentary strain theory, the idea that tissue deformation is the critical mechanical factor that regulates fracture healing. This theory proposed that bone healing occurs optimally when there is a certain level of mechanical strain at the fracture site. Perren’s work significantly contributed to the understanding of fracture biomechanics and influenced the development of fracture fixation techniques, including intramedullary nailing.
Micromotion Technology


1985
Micromotion Research Commenced
Micromotion Technology

1985
Micromotion Research Commenced
Preclinical studies on axial micromotion at the fracture site revealed that it stimulates the formation of callus and enhances stiffness compared to rigid fixation.

1989 – 2003
The Micromotion Advantage
Micromotion Technology

1989 – 2003
The Micromotion Advantage
Clinical studies demonstrated the benefits of axial interfragmentary motion for faster fracture healing, with clinical trials showing 20% faster healing with micromotion compared to rigid locking. Preclinical studies established that micromotion must start early, within the first 6 weeks, and be axial in direction.



2009
Unmet Need: Nonunions
Micromotion Technology

2009
Unmet Need: Nonunions
Clinical outcomes with third-generation nails converge on a 12% nonunion rate for tibial fractures. Delayed union remains a challenge, with 25% of tibial shaft fractures not healed within 5 months and 25% of femoral shaft fractures not healed within 7 months.

2010
Product Concept Development
Micromotion Technology
2010
Product Concept Development
The micromotion nailing concept was developed to address the unmet clinical need of nonunion and delayed healing. Bench testing was commenced to establish the required technical parameters. Preclinical testing completed at the Musculoskeletal Research Unit at University of Zurich.


2011 – 2012
Plating Innovations
Micromotion Technology

2011 – 2012
Plating Innovations
Locking plate constructs with micromotion – far cortical locking and dynamic locking screws – were developed to enhance fracture healing through interfragmentary motion.

2013
Solution: Axial Micromotion Nails
Micromotion Technology

2013
Solution: Axial Micromotion Nails
Micromotion-enabled tibial nailing allows controlled, low-force axial micromotion with high torsional stability, the evidence-based ideal biomechanics for fracture healing.

2014
OrthoXel Founded
Micromotion Technology
2014
OrthoXel Founded
OrthoXel acquired background intellectual property from Munster Technological University and commenced working to translate the science of micromotion into a commercially viable intramedullary nail product. The quality management system structure and key personnel were put in place.


2014 – 2017
First Products Developed
Micromotion Technology
2014 – 2017
First Products Developed
Patents applications submitted covering the sliding micromotion insert design that allows controlled axial movement while limiting torsional and shear movements. FDA 510(k) clearance and CE Mark certification obtained for the Apex Tibial Nailing System. Development of the Apex Femoral Nailing system commenced to apply micromotion to femoral shaft fractures.


2021
Faster Healing with Apex Nails
Micromotion Technology

2021
Faster Healing with Apex Nails
First clinical results for micromotion nailing of tibial fractures showed faster healing and significant reduction of delayed healing and nonunion compared to standard-of-care locked (third generation) nailing.

Evolution of Nailing Technology
1980s
Second-gen Locked Nails
Traditional Nailing

1980’s
Second-gen Locked Nails
The use of second-generation locked nails increased rapidly, including the AO and Grosse-Kempf nails. Research in this period demonstrated the benefits of nailing, including reduction of malunion and safety of early weightbearing.

1990s
Enhanced Design Innovations
Traditional Nailing

1990’s
Enhanced Design Innovations
Titanium nails were introduced and implant and instrument design innovations enabled an expansion in the indications for use for intramedullary nailing. Non-slotted nails with higher torsional rigidity began to replace the slotted cloverleaf cross-sections. Clinical evidence for the benefits of early weightbearing increased.

2000s
Third-gen Interlocking Nails
Traditional Nailing

2000’s
Third-gen Interlocking Nails
The third-generation nailing systems entered the market with interlocking screws and design features targeting enhanced stability.

2005
Angle-Stable Nailing Innovations
Traditional Nailing

2005’s
Angle-Stable Nailing Innovations
Evidence emerged showing that shear or torsional instability produces inferior callus. This motivated the development of angle-stable nailing to improve healing compared to unstable nailing.

2005 – 2015
New Surgical Approaches
Traditional Nailing
2005 – 2015
New Surgical Approaches
Suprapatellar insertion or the semi-extended approach to tibial nailing was developed. In femoral nailing, there was a shift from the piriformis fossa entry to a more lateral greater trochanter approach for antegrade nailing.


2010 – 2020
Advancements in Instrumentation and Ergonomics
Traditional Nailing
2010 – 2020
Advancements in Instrumentation and Ergonomics
Innovations focused on improving instrumentation ergonomics for streamlined clinical use entered the market.


2025
Present
Traditional Nailing

2025
Present
The core principles of early mobilization and relative stability through interlocked intramedullary nailing have not changed in 40+ years.




